Code development platform for open source projects from the European Union institutions 🔵 EU Login authentication by SMS has been phased out. To see alternatives please check here

Skip to content

Corollary question : to facilitate the Group filtering, do we centralize the sub-groups at a certain location :

Option 1 : under Shared ? ​(or C4?) PROs : the more logical and structural, creating a clear difference between NMS3 concepts (shared?) and C4/ concepts where HoS Epics/Issues/Boards... are located​ CONs : EPICs can be easily moved, but not the projects with code, generating hybrid location for the EPICs and code (like FW)​

Option 2 : no grouping, but Label displaying the squad ?​ PROs : will do the job, rather easy to manage and enrich for quality check when the "PI::" is mentioned (start from the PI::, and match the group (whatever his location) with the Squad label ​ CONs : extra label burden, not supposed to be used for this ​

Option 3 : no grouping, not squad label, management through a link from the PI objective by squad​ PROs : in a similar way as we did before with Leankit​ CONs : no single toolkit (Gitlab) to manage the EPICs, but it is a dream​

Edited by Eric PASTELEUR