reporting a contract outside the scope of the Directives (BT-01; BT-105, BT-136)
I would appreciate a clarification about reporting a contract outside the scope of the Directives.
Which approach is advisable and “the proper” one:
2. To choose for example “Directive 2014/24/EU” in BT-01 “Procedure Legal Basis”, to choose “Negotiated without prior call for competition” in BT-105 “Procedure Type “and to choose an appropriate value in the codelist BT-136 “Direct Award Justification Code”;
1. To choose “Other” in BT-01 “Procedure Legal Basis”, to choose “Negotiated without prior call for competition” in BT-105 “Procedure Type“ and to choose an appropriate value in the codelist BT-136 “Direct Award Justification Code” (for example “in-house”);
We saw in Developer Docs that “…The Procedure Legal Basis term refers to the EU regulatory domain that applies to the procurement. ... The "other" value shall **exclusively** be used for below threshold notices”.
Is it possible to use this field also for out-of-Directives contracts?
3. To choose for example “Directive 2014/24/EU” in BT-01 “Procedure Legal Basis”, to choose “Other single stage procedure” in BT-105 “Procedure Type “.
Do you recommend any other option?
Our question is connected to the future statistics of contract exceptions – we would like to be sure that we have a common understanding on national and on EU level.
issue